02-28-2020, 03:09 AM
How can I make the correct configuration of the base definitions match? in the real robot the base 0 coincides with the home position of the rail that is the base in robodk
when we execute the program only with the linear rail the same thing happens as if the 8 axes were coupled, as shown in the video "Video_runing_Rectangular2"
when running the robot alone there is no problem
the actual positions as shown in the photograph "real robot cartesian position" do not match those indicated in the simulation code, this photograph was captured on line 22 of the code generated by robodk and loaded to the controller, we believe it may be due to a conflict in the ABC rotary axes
in the other file only with the rail there are similar problems
when we execute the program only with the linear rail the same thing happens as if the 8 axes were coupled, as shown in the video "Video_runing_Rectangular2"
when running the robot alone there is no problem
the actual positions as shown in the photograph "real robot cartesian position" do not match those indicated in the simulation code, this photograph was captured on line 22 of the code generated by robodk and loaded to the controller, we believe it may be due to a conflict in the ABC rotary axes
in the other file only with the rail there are similar problems